To play AI Interrogation, enter a case, read the premise, and type questions into the terminal. You have ten tries to get a full confession. The suspect reacts to your words: the official description warns that being too mean can cause shutdown, while being too nice can let the suspect lie.
Start the correct experience
Open the Roblox game by TrueTalk AI with Place ID 109547184439419. Current public data lists a one-player server limit, so expect a solo session. Read the case information visible in game before using a guide; the six base cases, Daily Cases, and player-made content do not share one permanent answer set.
Locate the terminal field and try counter. Click or tap the text field, type one clear question, and submit using the visible interface. Do not use Roblox chat or the terminal as a code box. If input does not work, use the Controls guide to restore focus.
Understand the win condition
The stated objective is a full confession before the ten tries expire. Learning one detail is not necessarily enough. Build a chain that connects the suspect to the incident and asks them to state what they did, how they did it, and why.
The exact acceptance feedback is not documented publicly. Watch the live interface for a completion message, case transition, or badge award. Do not assume a dramatic reply is accepted until the game confirms the result.
Ask a bounded opening question
Begin with the current event, not a generic conversation. Ask the suspect to describe what they did before, during, and after the key moment. A bounded timeline produces times, places, people, and actions that can be compared later.
Follow with one access or witness question. Ask who could enter the location, who saw the suspect, what route they took, or what object they handled. Use the nouns in the case file and reply rather than adding evidence from another walkthrough.
Test the story
Once the suspect commits to details, choose one fact to test. Ask how a timestamp, camera, object, purchase, witness, or changed statement fits the account. If the suspect gives a new explanation, pin it to an exact time or action.
Do not ask several unrelated questions at once. A long prompt lets the response address the easiest part and ignore the contradiction. One focused comparison per try makes progress easier to judge.
Apply factual pressure
Pressure should come from mismatch. State the earlier claim and the conflicting fact, then ask for an explanation: “You said you never entered the room, but you described the item inside it. How did you know that?” This is firm without becoming insulting.
If the suspect refuses, lower emotional intensity but keep the same fact. If the suspect becomes agreeable and vague, ask what action they personally took. Read Tone Recovery when you cannot tell whether the run is hostile, too comfortable, or simply unfocused.
Request the confession
Reserve at least one late try for the final request. Summarize only the strongest chain: original claim, contradiction, and hidden action. Ask for a complete account including method and motive. Remove weak guesses that could distract the response.
If the suspect admits access but not the act, use the next question to connect access to the key object or result. If they admit the act but avoid motive, ask for the reason without reopening the whole timeline.
Use the ten tries as a budget
A practical plan is three setup questions, three evidence questions, two contradiction questions, and two confession attempts. This is a player method, not an official formula. Move earlier when the suspect exposes a strong conflict; slow down when the case premise is unclear.
Track the remaining count before each submission. If you reach try seven without a contradiction, stop gathering broad background and test the strongest time, location, access, object, or witness detail you have.
Base, Daily, and Custom cases
For a named base case, a current guide may provide community-reported evidence angles. Match them against your run. For a Daily Case, use the first attempt to map the premise and a later attempt to compress the route. For a Custom Case, first test whether the evidence chain is coherent enough to support a fair confession.
The official description says there are six base cases, while public badges currently name five. Do not invent a Case 6 title or transcript to complete the list.
Troubleshooting a failed run
If answers remain vague, request an exact time, place, object, or sequence. If the suspect changes the story, quote both versions. If they shut down, remove insults and accusation language. If they keep agreeing without confessing, stop reassuring and require a personal action.
After failure, save the strongest contradiction and the prompt that caused tone trouble. On the next run, reach the useful conflict sooner rather than repeating every question.
How-to-play FAQ
How many questions do I get?
The official description says ten tries in the standard loop.
Is every question worth one try?
Treat every submitted terminal question as part of the limited budget. Exact behavior for interface mistakes or paid features needs live confirmation.
Can one answer list beat every case?
No. Cases contain different premises and AI responses can vary. Reuse the investigation order, not unrelated nouns or a guaranteed transcript.
What happens when I am too mean or too nice?
The developer says excessive meanness can cause shutdown and excessive niceness can let the suspect lie. No numeric threshold is published.
Next, use the 10-Try Strategy to plan each submission or browse All Cases to match your current case.